ACE and ICSI treatment for male infertility celebrate 21 years

A breakthrough in male infertility treatment came 21 years ago when the first baby was born following IVF with ICSI (Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection), but there is no room for complacency, says Bourn Hall’s Head of Science Martyn Blayney.

Martyn Blayney, Head of Science at Bourn HallHis team is continually evaluating best practice and will be presenting posters at the Association of Clinical Embryologists’ 21st Anniversary ACE Conference.

Martyn says: “We continuously appraise our embryology procedures to ensure that patients are getting the best possible treatment and ACE is a good forum for us to discuss our findings with peers. The ACE conference is important as it helps establish best practice across the field.”

Bourn Hall embryologists will be showing two posters; one compares different culture media to evaluate if it has an influence on outcomes, and the other compares the performance of two types of needle used for ICSI.

Results for the culture media trial showed that choice of culture media used during embryo incubation had little impact on live birth weight. There was no difference in biochemical or clinical pregnancy rates, implantation rates or birth weight. There was a slight difference in gestational age at birth in weeks but this was probably insignificant when other maternal and paternal factors were taken into account.

Martyn comments: “These results show that patients are receiving a consistent quality of treatment and that the choice of culture media will not affect outcomes.”

The other study compared two types of needle used for ICSI, which did show an improvement in performance. The introduction of ICSI, in which a single sperm is injected directly into an egg, was a huge advance in the treatment of male infertility.

For the first time it gave couples with no chance of natural conception and a history of poor fertilisation with conventional IVF the opportunity to have a baby of their own.

A graph showing the effect of using Needle A and Needle B on laboratory Key Performance Indicators
A graph showing the effect of using Needle A and Needle B on laboratory Key Performance Indicators

There are various manufacturers and styles of needles so the study aimed to compare performance of different types. It showed a significant improvement with needle type B (see table).

It should be noted however that the needles were tested over different time periods. During the use of needle B a number of other improvements were made in the ICSI procedure, particularly the introduction of anti-vibration tables and of SpermSlow media.

“It is encouraging to see improvements in ICSI treatment across all parameters, fertilisation, clinical pregnancy, cleavage formation and blastocyst formation,” says Martyn. “These enhancements cannot be attributed entirely to the change in needle, so we plan a randomized controlled study to evaluate this further.”

The ‘9th Biennial and 21st Anniversary ACE Conference’ is to be held 5-7th January 2014 in Sheffield.

More information

You can read more about ICSI and other IVF treatments here.

Related articles

Sort By Date
  • January 5, 2017
    Male fertility impacted by SSRIs prescribed for depression
    There is evidence that SSRIs create temporary damage to sperm DNA.
  • Thomas Mathews, Bourn Hall's UK Medical Director
    February 3, 2015
    Three-parent IVF misleading term
    The term ‘three-parent’ baby is very misleading according to Bourn Hall Clinic Medical Director...
  • May 9, 2012
    Australian Study Into Implications of IVF Treatment
    No significant difference found in the risk between IVF and natural conception.